Evaluate the system
AI Decision Verification, Code Review, Model Assurance, and Formal Verification.
Explore verificationPolicy-Driven Verification-as-a-Service
MetaSolve verifies AI and software systems against defined policies, binds results to auditable evidence, and helps organizations make controlled release decisions.
Formal verification. Evidence lineage. Release gates. Continuous assurance.
Core value
How MetaSolve works
The primary journey stays concise. Detailed operational controls remain available for technical evaluation.
Identify the AI system, model, software, policy, deployment, and review scope.
Run technical, formal, security, model, or policy checks appropriate to the scope.
Link results to the exact evaluated artifact, policy version, and evidence source.
Apply policy rules, segregation of duties, escalation, and required human judgment.
Allow, review, or block release based on defined controls and available evidence.
Inputs: prompts, models, code, policies, evidence sources, deployment metadata.
Controls: claim extraction, proof obligations, security checks, model assurance, policy gates.
Outputs: findings, reviewer decisions, certificates, ledger receipts, continuous signals.
Assurance control plane
Flagship workflows are visible first; specialist modules remain available when the evaluation requires them.
AI Decision Verification, Code Review, Model Assurance, and Formal Verification.
Explore verificationPolicy-driven gates, reviewer workflows, projects, and tenant-scoped identity.
Explore governanceRoot of Trust, Evidence Vault, Evidence Ledger, certificates, and reports.
View evidence exampleScoped API keys, enterprise APIs, CI/CD, private cloud, and on-premise patterns.
Developer documentationVerification: AI Trust Gateway, Code Zone, model distillation assurance, Lean-backed formal workflows.
Governance: policy bindings, reviewer queues, release gates, authorization, runtime reassessment.
Evidence: signed certificates, hash-chained ledger receipts, retention, legal hold, PDF/JSON exports.
Integration: REST APIs, webhooks, service identities, supply-chain metadata, private deployment.
Evidence example
The sample is illustrative. It demonstrates the fields and fail-closed posture an evaluator can inspect; it is not a customer endorsement or regulatory approval.
Who MetaSolve is for
Bind credit, fraud, trading, or underwriting decisions to policy and reviewer evidence.
Evaluate public-sector AI and software workflows with traceable controls and oversight.
Govern clinical decision-support evidence without replacing clinical responsibility.
Apply fail-closed release gates and artifact provenance to high-assurance systems.
Connect model, policy, deployment, and supply-chain evidence before production release.
Review gaps, approvals, evidence lineage, and continuous risk signals in one workflow.
Deployment and integration
Start with a scoped workflow and expand only when identity, policy, evidence, deployment, and retention requirements are understood.
Formal Proof Discipline
Formal evidence is accepted only when the configured trusted kernel verifies the submitted artifact. Assumptions, dependencies, proof obligations, gaps, and semantic human review remain explicit.
Read technical research notesRepresentative mappings
MetaSolve is designed to support evidence mapping and assessment workflows. It does not certify compliance, guarantee approval, or replace an independent assessor.
View control mapping and Trust CenterBuilt for Independent Evaluation
This scenario illustrates product workflow only; it does not represent a named customer or a regulatory determination.
Packaging
Start with a controlled evaluation and move to regulated or enterprise assurance as governance, scale, and deployment requirements increase.
Best for: initial product evaluation before procurement.
Best for: consultants, individual professionals, and small internal pilots.
Best for: growing AI teams and controlled production evaluations.
Best for: banks, insurers, healthcare, government contractors, and regulated programs.
Best for: mission-critical, private-cloud, on-premise, and sovereign environments.
Purchasing a plan does not grant certification, regulatory approval, or a guarantee of compliance. Results remain limited to the tested evidence, controls, and declared scope.
FAQ
Through scoped APIs, webhooks, service identities, evidence records, and deployment-specific integration review.
No. It provides evidence, policy gates, escalation, and reviewer workflows; accountable legal, clinical, underwriting, audit, and compliance decisions remain human responsibilities.
MetaSolve fails closed or routes the result to review. Missing evidence is not converted into a passing claim.
Yes. The evaluation scope can include hosted models, internal models, open-source models, software artifacts, policies, and deployment evidence.
Private cloud, on-premise, sovereign, and hybrid requirements are scoped during enterprise architecture and security review.
No. Mapping helps organize relevant evidence; it does not constitute independent certification, compliance, or regulator approval.
Choose your next step
Discuss a controlled verification pilot for your AI, software, or regulated workflow.
Book an Enterprise Verification ReviewTry a limited Code Zone evaluation before creating an account.
Try Code Zone